Legal Opinion

Japan Whaling Ass'n v. American Cetacean Society

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 30, 1986No. 85-954PublishedCited by 675 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

In these cases, we address the question whether, under what are referred to in these cases as the Pelly and Packwood Amendments, 85 Stat. 786, as amended, 22 U. S. C. § 1978; 90 Stat. 337, as amended, 16 U. S. C. § 1821 (1982 ed. and Supp. Ill), the Secretary of Commerce is required to certify that Japan’s whaling practices “diminish the effectiveness” of the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling because that country’s annual harvest exceeds quotas established under the Convention.

*224I

For centuries, men have hunted whales in order to obtain both food and oil, which, in turn, can…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by675 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Trudeau v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  3. Clarke v. Securities Industry Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Franklin v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011

670 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API