Legal Opinion

Beaufort County v. South Carolina State Election Commission

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 22, 2011No. 27069PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT FOR RESPONDENTS

Chief Justice TOAL.

Petitioners seek a declaration from this Court in its original jurisdiction that the General Assembly has neither authorized the State Election Commission or the County Election Commissions to conduct a Presidential Preference Primary in 2012, nor mandated that petitioners bear the financial burden of conducting the primary. Because we are firmly persuaded that the General Assembly, through passage of Provisos 79.6 and 79.12 for fiscal year 2011-2012, intended to suspend the temporal limitation in S.C.Code Ann. § 7-ll-20(B)(2) (Supp. 2010), we enter…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Joytime Distributors & Amusement Co. v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Clarke v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  3. State v. SweatSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. Sloan v. South Carolina Board of Physical Therapy ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  5. Town of Mt. Pleasant v. RobertsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. South Carolina Election CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  2. Amisub of South Carolina, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  3. Fullbright v. Spinnaker Resorts, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  4. Arkay, LLC v. City of CharlestonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
  5. South Carolina Energy Users Committee v. South Carolina Electric & GasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API