Beaufort County v. South Carolina State Election Commission
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT FOR RESPONDENTS
Chief Justice TOAL.
Petitioners seek a declaration from this Court in its original jurisdiction that the General Assembly has neither authorized the State Election Commission or the County Election Commissions to conduct a Presidential Preference Primary in 2012, nor mandated that petitioners bear the financial burden of conducting the primary. Because we are firmly persuaded that the General Assembly, through passage of Provisos 79.6 and 79.12 for fiscal year 2011-2012, intended to suspend the temporal limitation in S.C.Code Ann. § 7-ll-20(B)(2) (Supp. 2010), we enter…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Joytime Distributors & Amusement Co. v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Clarke v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- State v. SweatSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Sloan v. South Carolina Board of Physical Therapy ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Town of Mt. Pleasant v. RobertsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Anderson v. South Carolina Election CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- Amisub of South Carolina, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Fullbright v. Spinnaker Resorts, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- Arkay, LLC v. City of CharlestonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
- South Carolina Energy Users Committee v. South Carolina Electric & GasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.