St. George Vineyard Co. v. Fritz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Henry Fritz, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 23d day- of June, 1899, upon the verdict off a jury, and also from an order entered in said -clerk’s office on the 29th day of July, 1899, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.
1Opinion of the Court
Patterson, J.:
The plaintiff, alleging that the defendant Fritz was, in the year .1891, a director of the California Vintage Company, a -corporation •of the State of New York, brought this action to enforce the liability created by section 30 of the Stock Corporation Law (Laws of *2351890, chap. 564, as aind. by Laws of 1892, chap. 688) for the failure to file an annual report of that corporation during the month of January, 1897, as required by that section. The plain tiff was a creditor of the corporation. The complaint, after alleging the indebtedness, and that the defendant 'Fritz was a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rowell v. . JanvrinNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Rudd v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Mahoney v. BernhardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Donnelly v. PancoastAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Tysen v. FritzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shepard v. . FultonNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. FosterAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912
- Seebeck v. KingNew York Supreme Court · 1901
- Gundlach-Bundschu Wine Co. v. FritzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Loeb v. BienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.