Tysen v. Fritz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal Dy the defendant, Henry Fritz, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Richmond on the 24th day of October, 1898, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 28th day of October, 1898, denying the defendant’s- motion for a new tidal made upon the minutes.
1Opinion of the Court
Woodward, J.:
This action was brought to recover from a director of a corporation a debt of the corporation on the failure of the proper officers to file annual reports as required by section 30 of chapter 688 of the Laws of 1892. (Chap. 36, General Laws.) Plaintiffs produced evidence in support of the various facts necessary to constitute a cause of action, and the jury found in their favor. From a judgment entered upon the verdict of the jury, and from the order denying a motion for a new trial, appeal comes to this court, the appellant urging that he was not a director of the corporation…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Losee v. . BullardNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Van Amburgh v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Bank of the Metropolis v. FaberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
3Cited by1 opinion
- St. George Vineyard Co. v. FritzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900