City of Industry v. Gordon
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUNN, J,
This appeal by some defendants in an eminent domain action is from a superior court order which (1) denied such defendants’ “Motion for Entry of Judgment of Dismissal” and (2) denied defendants’ motion for “Attorneys Fees Upon Abandonment.”
The record on this appeal consists of a clerk’s transcript. It discloses that appealing defendants were 2 of 88 individually named defendants in an action in eminent domain which was brought to condemn 34 parcels of property for flood control and public road purposes. Plaintiff’s complaint was filed January 19, 1966; defendants’ answer was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- County of Los Angeles v. OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Reid v. Valley Restaurants, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1957
- LeFave v. DimondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Torrance Unified School District v. AlwagCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- deSaulles v. Community Hospital of the Monterey PeninsulaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Chinn v. KMR Property ManagementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Stone v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Lafferty v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Pachmayr Gun Works, Inc. v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.