Legal Opinion
In re Jose M.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 23, 1993No. 10975PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The respondent appeals from an order of the Superior Court for Juvenile Matters at Waterbury transferring him to the regular criminal docket of the Superior Court pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-127.1 The respondent claims that (1) the court improperly admitted several hearsay statements into *383evidence and (2) the evidence was insufficient to support the trial court’s finding that there was probable cause to believe that he committed the crime of felony murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54c.* 2 We affirm the order of the court transferring the respondent to the regular criminal…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. James Harrison HathawayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- State v. HinckleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. JohnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. RuthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. OnofrioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. CalabreseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. HenrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. ColemanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- State v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- In re Michael B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.