Legal Opinion
Holland v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 26, 2008No. 95-524CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.
This Wmsfur-related proceeding is before the Court for final disposition following a 27-day trial on damages. In earlier proceedings, summary judgment was granted in favor of plaintiffs1 on the issue of liability. The Court found that certain contracts between the parties—described below—were breached by the enactment of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIRREA”). Holland v. United States, 57 Fed.Cl. 540, 565-66 (2003). Between December 3, 2007, and February 5, 2008, the Court held a trial to receive evidence and hear…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. CartwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Indiana Michigan Power Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Bluebonnet Savings Bank, F.S.B., Stone Capital, Inc. (Formerly Known as Cfsb Corporation), and James M. Fail v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Energy Capital Corp. (As General Partner of Energy Capital Partners Limited Partnership) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Landmark Land Company, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Holland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Spectrum Sciences & Software, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Steelray Consulting, LLC v. Overstock.com, Inc. and Does 1–20District Court, D. Utah · 2026