Legal Opinion
Magnum Opus Technologies, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 14, 2010No. Nos. 10-106C, 10-127CPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER *
GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.
Plaintiffs Magnum Opus Technologies, Inc. (“Magnum Opus”) and The Healing Staff, Inc. (“Healing Staff’) have moved pursuant to Rule 59(e) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) to alter or amend the judgment entered in this case on May 13, 2010.1 See Magnum Opus’s Motion for Reconsideration to Alter or Amend the Judgment (docket entry 99, June 9, 2010) (“Magnum’s Mot.”); Healing Staffs Motion for Reconsideration (docket entry 100, June 9, 2010) (“Healing Staffs Mot.”). Although plaintiffs succeeded on the merits of their bid protests,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. John H. Shaffer, Administrator (Acting) of the Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Distributed Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Z.K. Marine, Inc. v. M/V ArchigetisDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Palantir Usg, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Fcn, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- National Air Cargo Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- In re JohnsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- Fillmore Equipment of Holland, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.