Spreckels v. Spreckels
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from orders of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, one from a decree of partial distribution and the other from a decree of final distribution of the estate of a deceased person. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
In the above estate two appeals are taken, one from a decree of partial distribution' and the other from a decree of final distribution of the estate of decedent. . As both appeals are presented on the same record and the same points for a reversal of both decrees are urged, they will be considered and disposed of together.
The following facts will illustrate the points made. Appellants and respondents and their sister Emma C. Ferris, are the children and heirs at law of Claus Spreckels, deceased. The will of the latter was admitted to probate in June, 1909. Certain trusts were created by it…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. WesterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- In Re Estate of SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Partridge v. DevotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Estate of WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- In Re Estate of FlemingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dabney v. PhilleoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- In Re Balke's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Callnon v. WinrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- De Johnson v. BotillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Estate of GreerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.