Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Fleming

California Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1912No. S.F. No. 5869PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPHAL from an order of the' Superior Court of the County of Alameda refusing a new trial of a proceeding for the distribution of the estate of a deceased person. William H. Waste, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is an appeal by Ella Fleming Carter from an order denying her motion for a new trial of a proceeding for the final distribution of the estate of deceased, who died intestate. In her petition for distribution, appellant alleged that the only heirs at law of deceased were herself, an adult half sister of deceased, and Justine Fleming, Annie Fleming, and Ella Fleming, children of a deceased half brother of deceased, and she asked that the whole estate of deceased be distributed to her and said Justine, Annie, and Ella Fleming. There was another petition by Ella Woodbury and three others,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blythe v. AyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Estate of Piper v. PeopleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Estate of WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estate of FriedmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. In Re Estate of WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Hebrew Home for Aged Disabled v. FriedmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API