Legal Opinion

Partridge v. Devoto

California Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1905No. L.A. No. 1834PublishedCited by 11 opinions

PETITION for Writ of Mandate against the Board of Election Commissioners of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandate commanding the hoard of election commissioners of San Francisco to prepare the sample ballot to be mailed to the voters of said city at the election to be held on November 7, 1905, and the voting-machines to be used at said election, by omitting from said ballots and from said voting-machines the names of certain persons nominated by two separate certificates by voters of the city, who designate themselves by the party designations “Independent Republican Party” and “Independent Democratic Party,” respectively, and without' any separate columns for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gillis v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. In re Complaint of GreeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Craig v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Phillips v. CurleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  5. In re Social Democratic PartyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jolicoeur v. MihalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Federal Life Ins. Co. v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Giménez v. Junta Estatal de EleccionesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1968
  4. Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Miller v. GreinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API