Legal Opinion
Texas Co. v. Borne Scrymser Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided October 3, 1933No. 3512PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOPER, Circuit Judge.
Suit for infringement of a patent was filed by the complainant in the District Court against two defendants who filed a joint answer denying the validity of the patent or infringement thereof. One of the documents presented in the same pleading a counterclaim against the plaintiff for infringement of another patent, and the complainant filed a motion to dismiss the counterclaim principally on the ground that the defendant-claimant had acquired the cause of action subsequent to the filing of the original bill. The district judge granted the motion and dismissed the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- General Electric Co. v. Marvel Rare Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- American Mills Co. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Washington-Southern Navigation Co. v. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Jump v. LeonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Celite Corporation v. Dicalite Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Hartley Pen Co. v. Lindy Pen Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1954
- In Re NathanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1951
- Alexander v. HillmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- Radio Corporation v. Hygrade Sylvania CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.