Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Hillman

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 22, 1935No. Nos. 3736, 3737PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORTHCOTT, Circuit Judge.

These aré appeals from two decrees entered in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of West Virginia", one- of which was entered in a suit in equity, .wherein Piedmont Coal Company and others are plaintiffs and Tower Hill Connellsville Coke Company of West Virginia-is .defendant, and permitted the filing, of an ancillary bill. The other was entered in the ancillary proceeding so commenced, in which the receivers of Tower Hill Company, the appellants, are plaintiffs and the appellees are defendants. The original suit has been twice before…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Marvel Rare Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. White v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. American Mills Co. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Stewart v. RamsaySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Dunn v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1834

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. ROBB EVANS & ASSOCIATES, LLC v. HolibaughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  2. Columbia Foundry Co. v. LochnerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
  3. In Re NathanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1951
  4. Railroad Credit Corporation v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
  5. Sweetheart Plastics, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API