Legal Opinion
In Re Nathan
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 28, 1951No. 48059PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
98 F.Supp. 686 (1951)
In re NATHAN.
No. 48059.
United States District Court S. D. California. Central Division.
June 28, 1951.
Gendel & Raskoff, Los Angeles, Cal., for trustee.
Benno M. Brink, Referee in Bankruptcy, Los Angeles, Cal., Samuel A. Miller and Harry M. Fain, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent A. D. Juilliard & Co., Inc.
MATHES, District Judge.
This proceeding is before the court upon petition of the trustee in bankruptcy to review the referee's order of April 27, 1950 permitting withdrawal of a creditor's claim upon the condition inter alia that the creditor submit to a plenary suit by the…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- The Inter-State National Bank of Kansas City v. Frank Luther, Trustee, Matter of Garden Grain & Seed Company, Inc., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- In Re Solar Manufacturing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Nortex Trading Corp., Claimant-Appellant v. Samuel Newfield, Trustee of Kaunitz & O'brien, Inc., Bankrupt, Trustee-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Hartley Pen Co. v. Lindy Pen Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1954
- Ned Gill v. H. A. Phillips, Trustee of Tinney Produce Company, Inc., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.