Kane v. Kane
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
Both appellants and appellees agree that this action was one for the determination of heirship, and for an order for proportional distribution in accordance with that determination, upon the final settlement of the estate.
The appellees claim that because the administration of the estate was, at the time of the filing of the petition in this action, proceeding in the Probate Court in an orderly manner, that court had original and exclusive jurisdiction of the matters involved. They base their claim upon Section 8, Article IY of the Constitution, which provides:
"The Probate Court shall have…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Radaszewski v. KeatingOhio Supreme Court · 1943
3Cited by9 opinions
- John Weenink & Sons Co. v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- State Ex Rel. City of Mayfield Heights v. BartunekOhio Court of Appeals · 1967
- First National Bank v. Miami UniversityOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Margolis v. PaganoClermont County Court of Common Pleas · 1986
- Bilotti v. LaSalleSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.