Legal Opinion
Water Technologies Corp. v. Calco Ltd.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 14, 1989No. 82 C 4330PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
In this opinion, we consider the request for attorneys’ fees by the plaintiffs Water Technologies Corp., Water Pollution Control Systems, Inc. and Kansas State University Research Foundation (collectively “WTC”). For the reasons set forth below, we award attorneys’ fees in the amount of $184,537 and prejudgment and post-judgment interest of $66,751, for a total of $251,288.
I. Background
This case has a rather involved procedural history, which we will only summarize here. (A more detailed summary may be found in our earlier opinion in this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lam, Inc. v. Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Manville Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Monolith Portland Midwest Company, a Nevada Corporation v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Mathis v. SpearsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Rohm & Haas Company v. Crystal Chemical Company and Joe C. EllerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In re Folding Carton Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Howes v. Medical Components, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Zenith Goldline Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2003
- Joy Technologies, Inc. v. Flakt, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1996
- Chicago Tribune Co. v. U.S. Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998