Chicago Tribune Co. v. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MANNING, District Judge.
In this Freedom of Information Act case, plaintiff Chicago Tribune Company seeks: (1) enforcement of the court’s March 31, 1997 judgment in its favor, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 70; and (2) attorneys’ fees pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(E). For the following reasons, the Tribune’s motion to enforce is granted and its application for attorneys’ fees is granted in part and denied in part. Specifically, the Tribune is awarded $97,210.21 in attorneys’ fees and costs for work performed as of the date of the fee petition. If the Tribune wishes to supplement its petition…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- George E. Blue, Cross-Appellant v. Bureau of Prisons, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Earl F. Debold v. William R. Stimson, Director of Support, U.S. Post Office, Gary, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Shirley EDDLEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SWITCHCRAFT, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Solone v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Burlington Free Press v. University of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001