Legal Opinion
State v. . Barkley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided September 22, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The pertinent provisions of the statute, section 7, subsections (a) and (b), ch. 573, Public-Local Laws 1925, under which the defendant is indicted, are as follows:
“(a) All persons who shall hunt with a gun, and who shall have been a resident of Cabarrus County for three months, and who shall be sixteen years of age or over, shall, before entering any field for the purposes of hunting any wild bird or animal, be required to procure a hunter’s license from the game warden or other officer or person authorized to issue said license, and for said license the person procuring same shall pay to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Keith v. . LockhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Council v. . SanderlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- State v. MitchellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1902
- State v. . GallopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Moore v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McDowell v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. Brennan, New York County Courts1931
- McDowell v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1989