Legal Opinion
In re Grand Jury Subpoena
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided November 17, 1987No. Misc. No. 87-77PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
JEROME J. NIEDERMEIER, United States Magistrate.
This matter has been referred to us pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) to hear and determine the motion of Norris Hoyt, Commissioner of the State of Vermont, Department of Taxes (“Commissioner”) to quash a subpoena to testify before the grand jury issued on application of the United States Attorney for the District of Vermont. The subpoena directs the Commissioner to appear personally before the grand jury which is investigating a nontax matter and to bring with him certain sales tax records kept by the Vermont Department…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Grand Jury SubpoenaDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2002
- Glinka v. Howard Bank, N.A. (In re Powell)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1998
- In re United States for an Order Authorizing Judiciary Commission of LouisianaDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1996