Legal Opinion

Glinka v. Howard Bank, N.A. (In re Powell)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont

Decided October 19, 1998No. Bankruptcy No. 97-102774 FGC; Adversary No. 97-1085PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON RENEWED MOTION TO COMPEL

FRANCIS G. CONRAD, Bankruptcy Judge.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

Trustee seeks order1 compelling Bank to produce records of bank examinations. Commissioner contends that the materials sought are privileged under 8 V.S.A. § 508,2 and that the federal common law bank examination privilege militates strongly against disclosure. Trustee claims that the statute is unconstitutional. We hold that neither the Vermont statute nor the federal common law qualified bank examination render the reports privileged. Trustee’s Renewed Motion to Compel is granted.

FACTU…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Supreme Court of Virginia v. Consumers Union of the United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. American Civil Liberties Union of Mississippi, Inc., Plaintiffs v. Cliff Finch, Governor of the State of MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. State v. RoySupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  5. Nguyen Da Yen, Cross-Appellees v. Henry Kissinger, Secretary of State, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. wwsaf v. costello valente gentryVermont Superior Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API