Glassell v. Glassell
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los • Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. Lucien Shaw, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
The deceased, Andrew Glassell, was the father and the guardian of the person and estate of the plaintiff herein, and this action is brought for the recovery of money alleged to be due from deceased as such guardian. The ease was tried without a jury, and the court made findings and rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff for a certain sum of money found to have been due. by the deceased as such guardian to the plaintiff. From this judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial defendants appeal.
The deceased was appointed and qualified as guardian of plaintiff .in September,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clary v. ClaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Estate of CousinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- In re Estate of StottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
- In re the Guardianship & Estate of EschrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lerner v. Los Angeles City Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- In re Allard GuardianshipMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- In Re Estate of PiercyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Vincent v. WernerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
- In Re Estate of McPheeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.