Legal Opinion

In re the Guardianship & Estate of Eschrich

California Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1890No. 13485PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

William Moore was appointed the guardian of Albert C. and Charles Eschrich, and, as such guardian, received from the sale of certain lands belonging to them the sum of one thousand dollars, one half of which belonged to each. He allowed several years to pass without taking any steps in the matter of his trust, and used this money for his own purposes. On the petition of his wards he was cited to appear and render an accounting. He filed his account, in which he charged himself with one thousand dollars, and gave himself credit for $312, alleged to have been paid for two years’ board for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Estate of StottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Merrifield v. LongmireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Estate of ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Guardianship of Di CarloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. In Re Estate of PiercyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. People v. CasselmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  4. Equitable Surety Co. v. SappSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Luke v. KettenbachIdaho Supreme Court · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API