In Re Estate of Piercy
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County settling the account of an administrator of the estate of a deceased person. P. F. Gosbey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. John E. Alexander, Beasly & Fry, and Fry & Jenkins, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
This is an appeal by Andrew J. Piercy from the same order which was under review in Estate of Piercy, (S. F. No. 6819), ante, p. 750, [145 Pac. 88], just decided. In the former case the administrator appealed from the order settling his account. Here the opposing party appeals from that part of the order refusing to charge the administrator with compound interest on the rental value of the land of the estate. There is a separate transcript covering the present appeal, but many of the important facts are stated in the opinion filed in S. F. No. 6819. The record shows, further, that, with the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Bemmerly v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- In re LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Swinnerton v. Argonaut Land & Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Coburn v. GoodallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Michelson v. HamadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Redke v. SilvertrustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- In Re Jennings' EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1925
- Katz v. EnosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Estate of McSweeneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.