Kiewit Power Constructors Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1DissentKaren LeCRAFT Henderson, Circuit Judge
By framing the issue on appeal as a question of fact, the majority opinion invokes the deference we owe to the findings of fact of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board). See Maj. Op. at 28-29. In doing so, however, it ignores the Board’s misapplication of clear — and consistent — Circuit precedent. Because I believe the Board’s misapplication of prec*30edent makes its decision arbitrary and capricious — and because I also disagree that substantial evidence supports its determination that the two terminated employees did not threaten their supervisor — I respectfully dissent.
I
As the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Republic Aviation Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Auciello Iron Works, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- National Labor Relations Board v. United Steelworkers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Adtranz ABB Daimler-Benz Transportation, N.A. v. National Labor RelationsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Aroostook County Regional Ophthalmology Center v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.