Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kiewit Power Constructors Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 3, 2011No. 10-1289, 10-1312Published

1DissentKaren LeCRAFT Henderson, Circuit Judge

By framing the issue on appeal as a question of fact, the majority opinion invokes the deference we owe to the findings of fact of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board). See Maj. Op. at 28-29. In doing so, however, it ignores the Board’s misapplication of clear — and consistent — Circuit precedent. Because I believe the Board’s misapplication of prec*30edent makes its decision arbitrary and capricious — and because I also disagree that substantial evidence supports its determination that the two terminated employees did not threaten their supervisor — I respectfully dissent.

I

As the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Republic Aviation Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Auciello Iron Works, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. United Steelworkers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Adtranz ABB Daimler-Benz Transportation, N.A. v. National Labor RelationsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  5. Aroostook County Regional Ophthalmology Center v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API