Legal Opinion
Vavuris v. Pinelli
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 2, 1957No. Civ. 17038PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AGEE, J. pro tem. *
Plaintiff brought this action for damages for breach of an alleged oral agreement by defendants to execute a five-year written lease. The trial court found upon conflicting evidence that defendants did not make any such agreement. Plaintiff makes no contention that this finding is not supported by substantial evidence. Defendants also raise the statute of frauds. (Civ. Code, § 1624, subd. 4; Code Civ. Proc., § 1973, subd. 4.) The trial court held that this was likewise a good defense.
Judgment was rendered for plaintiff in the sum of $185, that being the amount of rent owing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chandler v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Bradbury v. HigginsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Dodd v. PaschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Allan v. Guaranty Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Watkins v. Dorothy A. McCartneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dover Mobile Estates v. Fiber Form Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Wallace v. DaleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990