Legal Opinion

Bahen v. Furley

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 5, 1919No. Civ. No. 3034PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Paul J. McCormick, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

Plaintiff brings this action against defendants to recover judgment for the total sum of $5,950, because of deceit practiced against him. The material allegations of the complaint, with the exception of certain formal points, were denied.

Without a word of explanation the record before us might be confusing. The explanation is that much of the testimony in the record refers to another case, tried in the superior court, but which cause is not the subject of this appeal—a suit brought by this same plaintiff against certain of the defendants here, and others who are not joined as defendants in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Calmon v. SarrailleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Corson v. BersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Central Mutual Insurance v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Beaver v. Union National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. McClure v. GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Sutton v. ThompsonUtah Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API