Legal Opinion

Duerr v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 29, 2000No. 00 C 0139PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DENLOW, United States Magistrate Judge.

This case is now before the Court on the motion of Defendant Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (“3M”) to dismiss Plaintiff Fred Duerr, Sr.’s (“Plaintiff’ or “Duerr”) complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), for failure to state a claim under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185. Because the parties relied on factual material outside of the complaint, this motion will be treated as one for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. The Court grants 3M’s motion for summary judgment…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Garrish v. United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
  2. Barraby v. Vt. State Employees Ass'nVermont Superior Court · 2010
  3. Fraternal Order of Police Metro Transit Police Labor Committee, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017
  4. Local Union No. 9, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Adesta, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
  5. Qamar v. Board of Trustees of Gov. State Uni. (GSU)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API