Proctor v. State Highway & Public Works Commission
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtErviN, J.
Both appeals present this question: In the absence of an agreement so providing, can the State Highway and Public Works Commission require a landowner to remove buildings of a permanent character from the portion of his realty taken for highway purposes to his remaining land %
The State has delegated to the State Highway and Public Works Commission the right to condemn private property for the establishment and maintenance of public highways. Gr.S. 136-19. When land is appropriated under this power of eminent domain for the right of way for a *691road, tbe general public acquires an easement only…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hildebrand v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- State Highway & Public Works Commission v. HartleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Reed v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Durham v. Trustees of Bullock ChurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- North Carolina State Highway Commission v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Department of Transportation v. RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- North Carolina Board of Transportation v. RandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Gallimore v. STATE HIGHWAY AND PUBLIC WORKS COM'NSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Dep't of Transp. v. Adams Outdoor Adver. of Charlotte Ltd.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- United States v. MartinDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.