Legal Opinion

United States v. Martin

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided April 2, 1956No. Civ. No. 771PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYES, District Judge.

The plaintiff relies upon the provisions of 3846bb of Michie’s Code of 1939, now General Statutes, § 136-19, for the proposition that the State of North Carolina through its agency, State Highway and Public Works Commission, acquired fee-simple title to a strip of land 100 feet wide and 5,137.6 feet in length, containing 11.5 acres, being an approach to and through the Guilford Battleground National Park, by filing in the office of the Register of Deeds of Guilford County a map to that effect, Exhibit 3, on October 15, 1936, pursuant to a resolution of appropriation…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. United States v. Commodore Park, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Yarborough v. North Carolina Park CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Roe v. Kansas Ex Rel. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Anzalone v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Core Banks Club Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. United States v. Garfield CountyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2000
  3. United States v. MartinDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API