State v. Woolworth
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtCallow, J.
— Harrison R. Woolworth appeals from a jury verdict finding him guilty of taking indecent liberties with his stepdaughter, a girl under age 14. See RCW 9A.44-.100(l)(b). He argues that his conviction should be reversed because (1) the jury received an erroneous instruction defining "knowledge" and (2) evidence of prior sexual contact with the victim was erroneously admitted.
I
The "Knowledge" Instruction
The crime of indecent liberties is defined in RCW 9A.44-.100.(1) A person is guilty of indecent liberties when he knowingly causes another person who is not his spouse to have sexual contact…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. ShippWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. HuelettWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- State v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. HightowerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- State v. LonguskieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
- Cantu v. THE CITY OF SEATTLECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- John Doe v. State Sex Offender RegistryIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. AhoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.