Legal Opinion

State v. Woolworth

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 13, 1982No. 8604-9-IPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallow, J.

— Harrison R. Woolworth appeals from a jury verdict finding him guilty of taking indecent liberties with his stepdaughter, a girl under age 14. See RCW 9A.44-.100(l)(b). He argues that his conviction should be reversed because (1) the jury received an erroneous instruction defining "knowledge" and (2) evidence of prior sexual contact with the victim was erroneously admitted.

I

The "Knowledge" Instruction

The crime of indecent liberties is defined in RCW 9A.44-.100.(1) A person is guilty of indecent liberties when he knowingly causes another person who is not his spouse to have sexual contact…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ShippWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. HuelettWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  4. State v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HightowerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  2. State v. LonguskieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  3. Cantu v. THE CITY OF SEATTLECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  4. John Doe v. State Sex Offender RegistryIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. AhoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API