Legal Opinion
Cantu v. THE CITY OF SEATTLE
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 11, 1988No. 18662-1-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.
Karen Cantu appeals an adverse decision regarding her discrimination and retaliation claims contending that the trial court erred in its failure to admit certain Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) findings. We affirm.
Procedural History
From 1976 to 1980, Cantu was an employee of the City of Seattle, City Light Department (hereinafter City Light). Based upon events which will be described herein, one of the several EEOC complaints filed by Cantu alleged that she was discriminated against on the basis of her sex and national origin; she emigrated from Germany in the 1950's. The EEOC…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Walton v. Eaton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- William Ray JOHNSON, Appellant, v. YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Jeanette J. PLUMMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTERN INTERNATIONAL HOTELS COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Shirley NULF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO., a New York Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- State v. ValladaresWashington Supreme Court · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sing v. John L. Scott, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- Shotwell v. DonahoeArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- Bierlein v. ByrneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Bierlein v. ByrneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Byrd v. BT FOODS, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.