Legal Opinion
Hetfield v. Barber
District Court, S.D. California
Decided November 28, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCORMICK, District Judge.
The petitioner, Hetfield, a duly commissioned Lieutenant Commander of tho United States Navy, in active service, asks for a writ of *724mandamus, directed to respondent, Barber, United States naval disbursing officer, commanding said disbursing officer to pay to Hetfield certain amounts of salary withheld from said Hetfield by the disbursing officer under orders of the Secretary of the Navy and the Comptroller General of the United States.
The salary of Hetfield, which is definitely fixed by statute, is made payable monthly in the sum of $365.75. The respondent is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Smith v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1917
- Dillon v. GroosDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1924
- Howe v. ElliottDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1924
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Bernard Anthony Durman, David Buffington, Cathy A. Moline, Charles Bradford Moline, Ramon F. Castellanos, and Juan A. CastellanosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Castro v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022