Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Howe v. Elliott

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided June 30, 1924No. 294PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CADE, District Judge.

Theodore F. Howe, Chief Pay Clerk, U. S. Navy, filed his petition for a mandamus against Dieut. William Elliott, S. C. U. S. Navy, disbursing officer of the U. S. Naval Station at Key West, Fla.

The petitioner alleges that he is a duly commissioned Chief Pay Clerk in the Navy; that Congress has made appropriation for his salary and certain other compensations; that respondent refuses to pay the compensation fixed by law and is unlawfully holding same to secure an alleged indebtedness claimed to be due the United States on account of a shortage in the accounts of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Benedict v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Dillon v. GroosDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barber v. HetfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  2. McCarl v. PenceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927
  3. Alexander v. MareCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1925
  4. Mare v. AlexanderDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1924
  5. Hetfield v. BarberDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API