Legal Opinion

Castro v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided December 5, 2022No. 2:22-cv-02046Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Angela Castro, No. CV-22-02046-PHX-JAT 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. 16 Regarding screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, this is a social security appeal over which 17 this Court has jurisdiction; and, on this limited record, the appeal is not clearly frivolous. 18 See Kennedy v. Andrews, 2005 WL 3358205, *2-4 (D. Ariz. December 8, 2005). 19 Regarding ability to pay,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. Maria Escobedo v. Apple American GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. Hetfield v. BarberDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API