Smith v. Jackson
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the Canal Zone; Henry D. Clayton, Judge. Mandamus by William H. Jackson, relator, against H. A. A. Smith, Auditor of the Panama Canal. Writ granted, and defendant brings error. The petition for tho writ of mandamus in this case was filed in the District Court of the Canal Zone, Balboa. Division, on April 3, 1916, by William, II. Jackson, relator, against H. A. A. Smith, auditor of the Panama Canal, respondent.
Read the full summary
In Error to the District Court of the Canal Zone; Henry D. Clayton, Judge. Mandamus by William H. Jackson, relator, against H. A. A. Smith, Auditor of the Panama Canal. Writ granted, and defendant brings error. The petition for tho writ of mandamus in this case was filed in the District Court of the Canal Zone, Balboa. Division, on April 3, 1916, by William, II. Jackson, relator, against H. A. A. Smith, auditor of the Panama Canal, respondent. Shortly thereafter the relator herein, who is also the judge for the District Court of tho Canal Zone, filed his disqualification to act as judge in…
1Per curiam
The elaborate opinion of Judge Clayton covers the entire case, and fully justifies the judgment rendered.
We find none of the assignments of error well taken.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by21 opinions
- Miguel v. McCarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- State ex rel. Payne v. ReevesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
- Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925
- West Coast Exploration Co. v. McKay Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- In Re the Abatement of Additional Assessment of Income Tax by the State AuditorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.