Legal Opinion

Brill v. Mushinsky

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 10, 1952No. 10855_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment in a civil action brought in the District Court for damages for breach of a contract to sell real estate or, in the alternative, for specific performance. Leon Brill, whose administratrix is appellant here, was the plaintiff. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case, the court directed a verdict on behalf of the defendant, upon the ground that in the opinion of the court there was no meeting of the minds of the parties and no completed contract. This we think was error.

Mushinsky owned the property. ' He employed a real estate broker…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. 2,877.37 Acres of LandDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1943
  2. Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. La GueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Vincent E. Jenkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  2. Casey v. Phillips Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  3. Howard v. Bradshaw and Ona Bradshaw v. United States of America, Howard v. Bradshaw and Ona Bradshaw v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  4. Slater v. BerlinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. Aycrigg v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API