Legal Opinion

Aycrigg v. United States

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 1, 1954No. Nos. 6299, 6309, 6314PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEMMON, Circuit Judge.

The inundation of Yuba County farms caused by a crevasse in a Feather River levee in 1937 has resulted in an inundation of claims filed in this Court by more than seventy landowners.

The findings of a special master regarding these claims are now before the Court for review.

The crucial question is:

Are those findings “clearly erroneous”, and, if so, to what extent?

1. Statement of the Case

On April 24, 1952, this Court handed down an opinion in the above-entitled causes, which had been consolidated for trial, holding that the plaintiffs were entitled to recover damages for…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. Oregon State Medical SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Quock Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Inland & Seaboard Coasting Co. v. TolsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Elwood v. . the Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Stewart v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Department of HighwaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  3. Abraham (Abe) Baker, Individually, and D/B/A Simmonds Upholstering Company v. Simmons CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963
  4. Clement J. Delman v. Federal Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958
  5. Camp v. OrtegaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API