Legal Opinion

California Fruit Growers' Ass'n v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 1908No. Civ. No. 562PublishedCited by 19 opinions

PETITION for Writ of Prohibition directed t'o the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an application for a writ to restrain the court and its receiver from selling certain personal property belonging to said Fruit Growers’ Association. The petition for the writ sets out all of the proceedings connected with the original appointment of the receiver, from which it appears that the association is a corporation organized under law, governed by a board of five directors; that these directors had all been guilty of fraudulent practices, and the majority of the board was then confined in jail, and each and all of the directors had abandoned the corporation' and its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wickersham v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Grant v. Superior Court of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles City Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Jacobs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. DeGarmo v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Guntert v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Brown v. Memorial National Home FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Sunset Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Evans v. Oregon Short Line RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1910

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API