Legal Opinion
Royster v. Laurel Highlands School District
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 14, 2014No. Civil Action No. 12-244PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*704 MEMORANDUM OPINION
CONTI, Chief Judge.
Pending before the Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Laurel Highlands School District (the “School District”). (ECF No. 28.) The School District filed a brief (ECF No. 29) and a concise statement of material facts (ECF No. 30) in support of that motion. Plaintiff, Joyce Royster (“Royster”), filed a brief in opposition to the motion. (ECF No. 33). Royster also filed a eounterstatement of material facts (ECF No. 34), to which the School District responded (ECF No. 35). At the close of briefing, the parties filed a joint concise…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Crawford v. Verizon Pennsylvania, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- BRZOZOWSKI v. PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISIONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- SCHREIBER v. MOON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICTDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- W.R. Hoy v. Borough of CochrantonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- W.R. Hoy v. Borough of CochrantonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016