Legal Opinion

Littrell v. Allemannia Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 17, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochrane, P. J.

This is an action to recover for total loss by fire of a dwelling and household furniture therein contained. The property was covered by a policy of fire insurance issued by the defendants. The policy in standard form contained the usual appraisal provisions as follows: “ In case the insured and this Company shall fail to agree as to the amount of loss or damage, each shall, on the written demand of either, select a competent and disinterested appraiser. The appraisers shall first select a competent and disinterested umpire; and failing for fifteen days to agree upon such umpire then, on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adams v. New York Bowery Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  2. Lang v. Eagle Fire Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Rosenwald v. Phenix Ins.New York Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Williamson v. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hansen v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  2. Littrell v. Allemania Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  3. General Corrosion Services Corp. v. "K" Way Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. Lee v. Hamilton Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API