Legal Opinion

Littrell v. Allemania Fire Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

Defendants had insured plaintiffs’ house against loss by fire. It burned on May 8,1926. Plaintiffs refused the request of defendants for the appointment of appraisers, relying upon the advice of counsel and following the decisions in Rosenwald v. Phœnix Ins. Co. (50 Hun, 172) and Lang v. Eagle Fire Co. (12 App. Div. 39). They claimed that an appraisal was not required by the terms of the policy because there had been a total loss. They obtained a judgment for the amount named in the policy, defendants appealed, and in January, 1928, this court, because of such refusal, reversed the judgment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ladd v. . StevensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Comey v. . United Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Lang v. Eagle Fire Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. Rosenwald v. Phenix Ins.New York Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Littrell v. Allemannia Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hansen v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  2. Brumel v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1936
  3. Tompkins County Trust Co. v. HerrickNew York Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Shaw v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
  5. Buchholz v. United States Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API