Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lee v. Hamilton Fire Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1929Published

1DissentO’Brien, J.

Assume that the policy is a valued one and that, in the event of total loss, the full value as therein stated is recoverable. Assume also that when property insured under a valued policy is 'Conceded to have been completely destroyed and to have passed out of existence, appraisal may not be enforced. (Rosenwald v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 50 Hun, 172; Lang v. Eagle Fire Co., 12 App. Div. 39.) When, however, the parties to an insurance contract disagree respecting the fact whether damage is partial or loss is total that rule does not apply, In such circumstances an appraisal provision in a policy…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Seyk v. Millers' National InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Corbett v. . Spring Garden Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Hartford Fire Insurance v. Bourbon County CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  4. Lang v. Eagle Fire Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. Rosenwald v. Phenix Ins.New York Supreme Court · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API