Legal Opinion

Kohn v. Ball

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided October 29, 1952PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwepston, J.

Plaintiff, Ball, bought a new Buick automobile from defendant, Kohn, d. b. a. Paris Motor Company on July 19,1950. Kohn is the authorized Buick dealer. He made no express warranty but simply placed in the pocket of the car the manufacturer’s warranty. In a day or two the car when exposed to rain leaked around the doors and front, damaging the seats and floor coverings. Upon complaint by plaintiff repeated efforts were made by defendant to correct the defect and defendant claims he succeeded; this is denied by plaintiff. This issue of fact was settled by the verdict of the jury in favor of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cantrell v. Burnett & Henderson Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Grissom v. Commerial National BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  3. G. M. C. Truck Co. v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. General Motors Corporation v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1960
  2. Ford Motor Company v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
  3. Adams v. Peter Tramontin Motor SalesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. Dougall v. Brown Bay Boat Works and Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. Vinyard v. DuckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API