Legal Opinion
Vinyard v. Duck
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided November 4, 1965No. 6 Div. 795PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWYN, Justice.
Appeal by defendants below (Paul Vinyard, F. G. Vinyard and Alden N. Vinyard, partners doing business as Maytag Sales & Service Company) from a judgment rendered on a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs (Carl E. and Gladys Duck). Defendants’ motion for new trial was overruled. Included in the motion were several grounds charging insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict.
The case went to the jury on counts 1, 4 and 5. Defendants’ demurrer to these several counts being overruled, they entered a plea of the general issue in short by consent.
Count 1 alleges, in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Ryan v. Progressive Grocery Stores, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Liberty National Life Insurance Company v. WeldonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Pabellon v. Grace Line, Inc. (Coston Supply Co., Third-And-Fourth-Party Defendants)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kilcrease v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Alfa Mut. Ins. Co. v. NorthingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- State v. HodgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
- Madison Highlands Development Company v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Pardue v. Citizens Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.