Legal Opinion

Grissom v. Commerial National Bank

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1889PublishedCited by 19 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Davidson County. AndRew Allison, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtFolkes, J.

This is a bill brought by complainant to recover of the defendant the sum of one thousand dollars, claimed as a balance due after crediting the bank with all. checks drawn against sundry deposits made therein by the complainant as a customer of the bank.

The defendant interposes two defenses. It admits that between May 1, 1886, and July. 27, 1887, the complainant made deposits with it in sundry sums, aggregating $5,184.05, but says that it has paid out the same, for and on account of complainant, upon sundry checks, except as to $1,000, which it says was paid upon and in discharge of a note of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. &198tna National Bank v. . Fourth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Ward v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Indig v. . National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Thomas R. Wood & Co. v. Merchants' Saving, Loan & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Adams v. OtterbackSupreme Court of the United States · 1854

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. NaiveTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Fogg v. TylerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1912
  3. Bagwell v. SusmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  4. Davenport v. State Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Bank of Montreal v. IngersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API