Legal Opinion

State v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1956PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The state advances the following contentions on this appeal:(1) The commission acted without and in excess of its powers in appointing Dr. Kurtz as an independent medical examiner.(2) Dr. Kurtz’s opinion as to cause of death does not constitute credible evidence to support the commission’s finding on that issue because Mr. Nelson’s letter to the doctor did not set forth all of the essential facts.(3) Dr. Kurtz’s opinion as to cause of death does not constitute credible evidence because based upon speculation as brought out in the state’s cross-examination of the doctor.(4) The commission did…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Hallum v. Village of OmroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Berg v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Zweig v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lies v. Ohio Veterinary Medical BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Allied Compensation Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Meyer v. FronimadesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Wright v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Falke v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API