Legal Opinion

Arnold v. State of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1969No. Civ. 11660; Civ. 11661; Civ. 11663; Civ. 11664PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRAY, J. *

The four cases entitled as above have been consolidated upon this appeal. The respective plaintiffs appeal from judgments dismissing their, respective cases under the provisions of section 583, Code of Civil Procedure.

Question Presented

Were the statutory five-year dismissal periods extended by periods of impossibility, impracticability or futility ?

Record

On April 21, 1959, in a tunnel on the Feather River which was being bored by the State of California for the Oroville Dam project, an explosion occurred killing Donald E. Good, Robert Arnold and Chester J. Zurek, and causing serious…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Canifax v. Hercules Powder Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Corning Hospital District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. General Motors Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Rose v. KnappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brunzell Construction Co. v. WagnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Crown Coach Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Bank of America v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Good v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Lopa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API