Legal Opinion

Shapleigh Hardware Co. v. Farmers Federation, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1928PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.

In Ore Co. v. Powers, 130 N. C., 152, 41 S. E., 6, the debtor sent a check to a creditor by letter which stated: “We enclose you check for $3,210.46 which balances account with your good self.” This Court upon such fact declared the law to be: “Having accepted the check with a statement in the letter that it was for balance in full and cashed the check, the plaintiff is bound thereby in the absence of evidence of fraud or other conduct on the part of the defendants to relieve the plaintiff from the effect of its acceptance of the check in full payment.” Thomas v. Gwyn, 131 N. C., 460, 42 S.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kerr v. . SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  2. DeLoache v. DeLoacheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. McCrorey v. ThomasSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  4. Rosser v. . BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Aydlett v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Zanone v. RJR Nabisco, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Walston v. . CoppersmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Phillips v. Phillips Construction CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Harris v. . KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Bradshaw v. . CongerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API