Legal Opinion

Harris v. . Kennedy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 30, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClabksoN, J.

We think tbe charge of tbe court below correct. There was a dispute between plaintiff and defendant. Tbe letter from defendant to plaintiff set forth what be owed plaintiff and enclosed check for $33.30, and in tbe letter be stated “check to balance.” Plaintiff cashed tbe check.

Hardware Co. v. Farmers Federation, 195 N. C., 702, is a case on “all fours,” at p. 704 tbe law is stated as follows: “In Ore Co. v. Powers, 130 N. C., 152, 41 S. E., 6, tbe debtor sent a check to a creditor by letter wbicb stated: ‘We enclose you check for $3,210.46, which balances account with your good self.’ This…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCrorey v. ThomasSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  2. Aydlett v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  3. Armstrong v. . LononSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Davis Sulphur Ore Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  5. Thomas v. Gwyn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Nello L. Teer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. Lochner v. Silver Sales Service, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API