Walston v. . Coppersmith
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.
Did the delivery of the check with the notation thereon “balance on potatoes,” after a dispute had arisen between the parties, and the subsequent cashing of said check by the plaintiff, constitute an accord and satisfaction?
The principle of law involved in the transaction has been discussed in many eases. The leading authorities upon the subject are assembled in Hardware Co. v. Farmers Federation, 195 N. C., 702, 143 S. E., 471. It is not controverted that a dispute had arisen between the parties before the delivery of check. Obviously, if the cheek had been delivered under the circumstances…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pope v. . PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Sylva Supply Co. v. WattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Shapleigh Hardware Co. v. Farmers Federation, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hayes v. RicardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Pearce v. BarhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Cartwright v. . CoppersmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Batten v. . AycockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Highfill v. ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.